International FootballAfter Mislintat's shadow: Geelen defends Cruijff, but Ajax still walks on thin ice
International Football

After Mislintat's shadow: Geelen defends Cruijff, but Ajax still walks on thin ice

Core answer: Ajax đang bảo vệ Jordi Cruijff trước hình ảnh giám đốc làm việc đơn độc; giám đốc điều hành Menno Geelen khẳng định Cruijff tham vấn nhiều bộ phận, quy trình chuyển nhượng đã được rà soát sau thời Sven Mislintat. Key facts: - Het Parool đăng bài về việc Jordi Cruijff làm việc một mình. - Geelen: Cruijff trao đổi với huấn luyện viên trưởng, giám đốc tài chính và ủy viên bóng đá. - Mislintat chi hàng triệu euro năm 2023; nhiều tân binh thất bại ở Amsterdam. - Toàn bộ quy trình chuyển nhượng được đánh giá và cải thiện. - Daniel de Ridder và Siem de Jong được đào tạo thành giám đốc kỹ thuật. Source: Het Parool Related Q&A: - Cruijff có thực sự làm việc một mình? Theo Geelen, không; ông tham vấn huấn luyện viên trưởng, giám đốc tài chính và các bộ phận kỹ thuật. - Sai lầm của Mislintat là gì? Ông chi hàng triệu euro vào tân binh năm 2023 nhưng nhiều người không đạt phong độ. - Ajax thay đổi quy trình chuyển nhượng ra sao? Toàn bộ quy trình được rà soát, gắn với cố vấn tài chính và các giám đốc kỹ thuật trẻ.

When the Dutch newspaper Het Parool portrayed Jordi Cruijff as a technical director working alone, I remembered the afternoons in Hamburg, where I used to scribble down under-19 matches in a notebook full of numbers that not everyone understood. The summer sediment: I dig, and I find a season that has never been written. At 60, I have learned that data stops at the stadium gate. Inside, people play with fear and dreams. Amsterdam now plays with which fear? A dream named Cruijff, or the nightmare of the Sven Mislintat era? Menno Geelen, Ajax's chief executive, rejected the Het Parool article with one repeated message: Cruijff does not work alone. He frequently consults the head coach, the coaching staff, finance director Shashi Baboeram Panday and a football commissioner. Former players Daniel de Ridder and Siem de Jong are being developed as technical directors. Geelen added that Ajax's football axis was not functioning properly before, but that this has been addressed. The entire transfer process has also been reviewed and improved. Anyone who followed Ajax in the 2026–24 season cannot forget Mislintat spending millions on new players only to watch them sink in Amsterdam. That period has been evaluated extensively, including externally. It was a major crack in the fans' trust, and it explains why every move Cruijff makes today is scrutinised. On a procedural level, Geelen's signals are positive. Having the finance director involved in technical consultations suggests that every signing decision must answer budget questions, not only sporting ones. Bringing former players like De Ridder and Siem de Jong into the management pipeline is an effort to preserve Ajax's philosophy from within rather than depend on an outside scout. Compared to the Mislintat era, when signings were made more on reputation than on the coach's tactical needs, the risk of system misfit may have dropped. But that is a process argument, not evidence from the pitch. I have no xG, no PPDA, no direct numbers belonging to Cruijff to verify anything. The key issue is not statistical, it is about power structure and media perception. Geelen talks about collaboration, yet the shadow of the name Cruijff still hovers over everything. Jordi Cruijff is not just a director; he is the symbol of a football philosophy, and the easiest target when results go wrong. The more Ajax emphasises teamwork, the more they seem to run from the bigger question: if Cruijff has the final say, can the Cruijff name protect the whole system? Too much consultation can create an illusion of safety. When everyone nods, no one is truly accountable if a mistake happens. Mislintat collapsed because of isolation. Cruijff could collapse in the opposite way — dissolved into a fake consensus culture where even the worst decision is justified by the phrase "we discussed it together". Based on my years of watching European ties, I know that media crises rarely end with an interview. Geelen may be right, but the image of a director working alone will not disappear just because of a statement. It will only fade if Cruijff brings in players who fit the right position, price and philosophy. A good process is only the foundation, not the fortress wall. Football is a game of results. I often write about young players as broken pottery still bearing the potter's fingerprints, not polished gems. Ajax now is the same. They do not need a saviour named Cruijff; they need a technical director who listens, and a board brave enough to take responsibility. Colleagues once called me too rational. Perhaps they were right, because I only trust what can be verified on the pitch, not what is said in the corridors. The heart of the pitch has no algorithm. The World Cup was never meant to prove who is right. Football is always younger than us. The question for Ajax is not what Geelen says today, but whom Cruijff will sign in the next window, and whether that player truly belongs to the system the coach needs. I will wait, notebook in hand, and keep digging into the next sediment layer of the season.

After Mislintat's shadow: Geelen defends Cruijff, but Ajax still walks on thin ice